Tap here to download a printable version of this infographic.
If you live with chronic pain, you’ve probably heard some version of this story before:
But there’s a big difference between a vague idea and something measurable.
In a survey we conducted with a broad global audience (1,418 participants, average age 35.6), we looked at three specific childhood adversity experiences and how they relate to whether someone reports chronic pain in adulthood.
What we found was consistent, statistically significant, and – in one category especially – striking.
We used three yes/no questions about experiences before age 18, drawn from the same family of questions used in adverse childhood experiences (“ACEs”) research.
Specifically, we asked whether, prior to age 18, a respondent:
These map to themes the original CDC–Kaiser Permanente ACE study helped establish in adult health research.
Across all three childhood adversity types we measured, respondents who answered “Yes” to that adversity type were more likely to report chronic pain in adulthood.
Difference: +9.8 percentage points, statistically significant (p ≈ 0.0005)
Difference: +12.3 percentage points, highly statistically significant (p ≈ 2.5e-06)
This was the strongest single signal in the dataset.
Difference: +18.9 percentage points, extremely statistically significant (p ≈ 4.6e-11)
In short, in this sample, just over half of respondents who reported childhood abuse also reported chronic pain in adulthood.
We also created a simple summary indicator:
In the data:
That’s a +15.0 percentage point gap, also highly statistically significant (p ≈ 1.2e-08).
In our three measures, the abuse item produced the largest gap in chronic pain prevalence:
That doesn’t mean the other adversity categories are unimportant. They’re clearly associated too.
But abuse stands out because the difference is larger — and because abuse is a direct, person-targeted harm that can shape stress reactivity, threat perception, and mental health across the lifespan. It’s also often under-discussed in routine healthcare settings.
Clinically, this doesn’t mean every pain visit should become a trauma interview. But it does suggest something important for providers and systems:
Trauma-informed care isn’t a niche philosophy. It may be relevant to a meaningful share of adult chronic pain patients.
Our infographic uses one consistent framing for clarity – “Among people with childhood adversity, what share had chronic pain?”
But to be confident this isn’t a quirk of how the question was sliced, we also examined the data in reverse:
“Among people with chronic pain, how many reported childhood adversity?”
That direction tells the same story.
1. Family loss before 18:
Difference: +8.8 percentage points, p ≈ 0.00046
2. Household alcohol/drugs or mental illness before 18:
Difference: +12.7 percentage points, p ≈ 2.5e-06
3. Mental/physical abuse before 18:
Difference: +16.2 percentage points, p ≈ 4.6e-11
4. Any adversity:
Difference: +15.2 percentage points, p ≈ 1.2e-08
In other words, roughly 7 in 10 respondents with chronic pain reported at least one ACE, compared with about 5 in 10 of those without chronic pain.
The reverse direction confirms the pattern: chronic pain and childhood adversity track together regardless of which side of the comparison you start from.
That bidirectional consistency is one of the strongest signals statistically. Both framings agree.
Our findings line up with a much larger body of public health research connecting adverse childhood experiences to adult health outcomes. The original ACE Study found that childhood adversity was associated with a range of adult health risks.
The point is not that adversity “explains” chronic pain. Pain is multifactorial: biology, injury, inflammation, genetics, environment, and access to care all play roles. But the broader evidence base – and our survey – suggests early adversity may belong in the conversation more often than it currently is.
It’s worth pausing here because this topic is sensitive, and it’s easy for people to hear the wrong message.
Our data does not say:
None of that is supported, and those framings can be harmful.
What our data does suggest is a more nuanced and more validating statement:
For many adults with chronic pain, early adversity may be part of their health story – and early adversity shows up at higher rates than in people without chronic pain.
That can be validating for patients who have long felt that their life history and health were treated as unrelated, or that their symptoms were reduced to “stress” in a dismissive way.
The goal is not to psychologize pain. It’s to widen the lens.
You’re not alone.
Many people spend years navigating a medical system that tends to look for a single structural explanation for chronic pain, and end up feeling dismissed when answers don’t come quickly. This finding is for you.
Your pain is real.
You’re not making it up.
Your history matters.
Our bodies keep score in many ways, and pain can be both biological and shaped by lived experience.